Other
Like

Straddle Follow Up

Richard Croft
March 10, 2013
761 Views
0 Comments
4 minutes read
no-cover

Last week I talked about using XIU straddles and short-term bonds as an alternative approach to medium and long-term fixed income securities. I was speaking about the use of straddles as a hedging mechanism that might provide the same level of protection normally associated with fixed income assets. And I posited that the duration risk associated with medium and longer term fixed income securities may create more portfolio risk than the short-term bond / straddle combination.

This week I want to focus on the straddle as an insurance policy which very different from making an investment decision in search of a positive return. With insurance you are buying protection and the objective should be to keep the costs as low as possible.

In the example cited last week the total cost for the XIU March (2014) 18 straddle was $1.60 per share. That is also the maximum risk although it is mostly theoretical. To lose the entire $1.60 XIU would have to close at exactly $18 per share at the expiration date in March 2014. The straddle would cost nothing and would generate a profit if XIU were to close above $19.60 or below $16.40 at expiration.

If we exercise some nimble trading throughout the next year we may be able to reduce the net risk associated with the straddle and by extension the net cost. For example suppose that XIU rallied to $19.50 per share. Your initial reaction would be to close out the straddle at a profit or at a minimum close the profitable side and continue to hold the puts.

Selling the calls while retaining the puts is not a bad strategy but it does enact a trade from the perspective of an investment strategy rather than an insurance product. While it may be the right investment strategy it reduces the impact of the insurance policy because the strike price of the remaining put is now $1.50 below our hypothetical price for XIU.

Another approach is to sell the put at a loss and replace it with a new put at the $19.50 strike price. Rolling up the put would probably cost 50 cents per share which means that you would now have $2.50 per share invested in the straddle. However you have reduced your maximum downside risk in the straddle to $1.00 per share rather than the initial $1.60 per share.

That’s because you now own XIU March (2014) 18.00 calls and XIU March (2014) 19.50 puts at a net cost of $2.50 per straddle. At the March expiration you are guaranteed to get back $1.50 per share no matter where XIU closes. More importantly you still own at-the-money crisis insurance.

The idea is to continue with these rolling strategies as the strategy works its way towards expiration. Each time you roll up or down the losing position you reduce the maximum risk associated with the trade while retaining the insurance.

If you want to see more on this you can request a PowerPoint presentation using Agrium, which details how you would roll up or down depending on where the stock went. Just post your request in the comment section.

Richard Croft
Richard Croft http://www.croftgroup.com/

President, CIO & Portfolio Manager

Croft Financial Group

Richard Croft has been in the securities business since 1975. Since February 1993, Mr. Croft has been licensed as an investment counselor/portfolio manager, operating under the corporate name R. N. Croft Financial Group Inc. Richard has written extensively on utilizing individual stocks, mutual funds and exchangetraded funds within a portfolio model. His work includes nine books and thousands of articles and commentaries for Canada’s largest media channels. In 1998, Richard co‐developed three FPX Indexes geared to average Canadian investors for the National Post. In 2004, he extended that concept to include three RealWorld portfolio indexes, which demonstrate the performance of the FPX portfolio indexes adjusted for real-world costs. He also developed two option writing indexes for the Montreal Exchange, and developed the FundLine methodology, which is a graphic interpretation of portfolio diversification. Richard has also developed a Manager Value Added Index for rating the performance of fund managers on a risk adjusted basis relative to a benchmark. And In 1999, he co-developed a portfolio management system for Charles Schwab Canada. As global portfolio manager who focuses on risk-adjusted performance. Richard believes that performance is not just about return, it is about how that return was achieved.

196 posts
0 comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.